Rifts Plague Anti-Chávez
Venezuelans
By Juan Forero
The New York Times
31 de Marzo de 2006
Julio Borges is an unusual politician among Venezuela's
fragmented opposition. He is running for office. While
much of the rest of the opposition is intent on boycotting the presidential
election this year, Mr. Borges was busy here on a recent two day campaign
swing, shaking hands, kissing cheeks and trying against long odds to win over
supporters of President Hugo Chávez. "We spent seven years trying to get
Chávez out of Miraflores," Mr. Borges said, referring to the presidential
palace. "What we have to do is get Chávez out of people's hearts."
He is the first to admit that it is a lonely task. Mr.
Chávez remains hugely popular, with a 55 percent approval rating in opinion
polls, for having funneled billions of dollars in oil revenue to the poor.
Perhaps more important, he has put his stamp on nearly every aspect of life,
and every institution of real power. Mr. Borges argues that boycotting
elections only adds to Mr. Chávez's power and has already made Venezuela in
effect a one-party state. Proponents of a boycott say Mr. Chávez has undermined
the institutions of democracy, so they seek to undercut his legitimacy by
spoiling elections.
They charge that the president stacked the Supreme Court and
the five-member National Electoral Council, has registered fraudulent voters
and keeps tabs on how Venezuelans vote — all accusations that the government
denies. Many supporters of a boycott are in the segment of the opposition that
failed to oust Mr. Chávez with a coup attempt and a two-month oil strike in
2002, and a recall referendum in 2004. Last December they organized a
five-party boycott of the elections for the National Assembly, losing all
representation in the government. Some opposition leaders called that boycott a
success because 75 percent of the voters abstained, showing their unhappiness
with the electoral system Mr. Chávez had established.
"It's a diabolical system," said Antonio Ledezma,
a leader in National Resistance, a group of opposition leaders that favors a
boycott this year. "We win by resisting, to not be under the thumb of a
government that wants to dominate us." While international monitors have
called past elections here fair, they have also noted deep public distrust of
electoral officials and called for an overhaul of the Electoral Council, which
oversees the elections. A newspaper
editor, Teodoro Petkoff, and the governor of the state of Zulia, Manuel Rosales,
are considered possible presidential candidates, but Mr. Borges is the only one
who has declared his candidacy so far. He says his biggest obstacle is uniting
a disillusioned opposition, whose fractures have been among Mr. Chávez's
biggest advantages. "The most difficult challenge is to get past the noise
of our own opposition," said Mr. Borges, 36, a lawyer from Caracas.
"The opposition does not have the luxury to just give up on politics.
Here, some people say: 'Let's not do anything. Let's hope for a miracle.' I
don't believe in that."
As in the rest of Venezuela, people in this state, Lara, are
solidly behind Mr. Chávez and at best indifferent to Mr. Borges's small First
Justice Party, whose members are mostly young professionals from wealthy
districts of Caracas. Potential voters were polite but distant. When one
unabashed supporter, Carmen Martínez, embraced Mr. Borges — whispering,
"May God and First Justice be our hope" — it was a bright spot in an
otherwise difficult campaign swing. Mr.
Borges does not sugarcoat the obvious: his campaign is far behind,
underfinanced and spread thin. His one advantage may be that most Venezuelans —
84 percent, according to a recent survey by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, a
Washington polling firm — support taking part in the election, even if they
question the impartiality of the electoral authorities.
His first big battle was with his own party, which went
against him and voted to sit out last year's legislative elections. But he also
faces an image problem. Many Venezuelans see his party as close to the Bush
administration, elitist and out of touch with Mr. Chávez's base in the
country's ramshackle barrios. "They're seen as the yuppie party, and the
challenge is how do you reach the poorest people," said a senior American
diplomat in Caracas, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of embassy
rules. "It's not enough being the anti-Chávez," another American
diplomat said. "You have to offer a plan and an alternative."
To do that, Mr. Borges and his aides say they are going to
go after the president where he is vulnerable. While Mr. Chávez appears to be
obsessed with the United States, Mr. Borges said surveys for his campaign
showed that Venezuelans were much more concerned about unemployment and rampant
crime. "Before voting for the Chavistas, I'll vote for Borges,"
Johanna Padilla, 29, said after meeting Mr. Borges as he went from house to
house here. "All we have here is crime. There's no work. If you get a job,
it's for three months and you're out." On his campaign swing, wearing
jeans and a blue pullover shirt, Mr. Borges handed out fliers titled "The
President's Gifts," about Venezuelan aid to other countries. "We want
to show we're more nationalistic, more patriotic, more worried about Venezuela
than Chávez," he said. "He's more involved in trying to become the
president of Latin America. This is good for us."
For now the message is a hard sell. Mr. Chávez's largess to
the poor, after all, has won him a solid following that is not about to switch
to an unknown like Mr. Borges. "I adore the man and thank God he's in
power," Elizabeth Jiménez, 37, said of the president. "The opposition
— each day they lose more standing. They criticize everything, everything
that's for the people. But when they were in power they never did
anything."